Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a case control study of survival in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5

Alexandra Maier, Franziska Stocks, Wolfgang Pommer, Walter Zidek, Martin Tepel, Alexandra Scholze

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Abstrakt

It is still controversial whether the mode of dialysis or preexisting comorbidities may influence the prognosis of patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5. Therefore, we performed a prospective case control study to evaluate whether the mode of dialysis may influence outcome. We found 25 cases on peritoneal dialysis (PD) treatment and 75 age and sex-matched controls on hemodialysis (HD) treatment for more than 3 months. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. During the follow up of 58 months, 6 out of 25 patients (24%) died in the PD group, whereas in the HD group 26 out of 75 patients (35%) died (relative risk 0.69 [95% CI 0.32 to 1.49]; P = 0.46). Survival was not significantly different between the groups as indicated by Mantel-Cox log-rank test (hazard ratio 0.52 [95% CI 0.25 to 1.10]; P = 0.11). Multiple variable regression showed that age and diabetes mellitus, but not mode of dialysis, predicted death in patients with chronic kidney disease. It is concluded that age and comorbidities but not mode of dialysis are important to predict survival in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftTherapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis
Vol/bind13
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)199-204
Antal sider6
ISSN1744-9979
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2009

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a case control study of survival in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater