Healthcare professionals' perspectives on traumatic childbirth - interpreting the data

Katja Schrøder; Jan Stener Jørgensen; Ronald F Lamont; Niels Christian Hvidt

doi:10.1111/aogs.12935

Healthcare professionals' perspectives on traumatic childbirth - interpreting the data

Katja Schrøder, Jan Stener Jørgensen, Ronald F Lamont, Niels Christian Hvidt

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Kommentar/debat › Forskning › peer review

Abstract

We would like to thank Cauldwell and Bewley (1) for their encouraging comments regarding our recent manuscript 'Blame and guilt - a mixed methods study of obstetricians' and midwives' experiences and existential considerations after involvement in traumatic childbirth' (2). The manuscript is the first publication from a large interdisciplinary study, and more data and analyses will follow. While we agree that it is an important finding that 87% agreed with 'Memories of what happened to the patient kept troubling me for a long time after the event', we do not share the authors' interpretation of the item to be representative of intrusive memories.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Vol/bind	95
Udgave nummer	9
Sider (fra-til)	1079-1080
ISSN	0001-6349
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12935
Status	Udgivet - 1. sep. 2016

Dokumenter og links

10.1111/aogs.12935

SDU link

Tjek adgangen til materialet i Syddansk Universitetsbiblioteks søgemaskine

Citationsformater

@article{ffa1a4b62ce94a5699221e2cfcecef33,

title = "Healthcare professionals' perspectives on traumatic childbirth - interpreting the data",

abstract = "We would like to thank Cauldwell and Bewley (1) for their encouraging comments regarding our recent manuscript 'Blame and guilt - a mixed methods study of obstetricians' and midwives' experiences and existential considerations after involvement in traumatic childbirth' (2). The manuscript is the first publication from a large interdisciplinary study, and more data and analyses will follow. While we agree that it is an important finding that 87% agreed with 'Memories of what happened to the patient kept troubling me for a long time after the event', we do not share the authors' interpretation of the item to be representative of intrusive memories. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.",

author = "Katja Schr{\o}der and J{\o}rgensen, {Jan Stener} and Lamont, {Ronald F} and Hvidt, {Niels Christian}",

year = "2016",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/aogs.12935",

language = "English",

volume = "95",

pages = "1079--1080",

journal = "Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica",

issn = "0001-6349",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Healthcare professionals' perspectives on traumatic childbirth - interpreting the data

AU - Schrøder, Katja

AU - Jørgensen, Jan Stener

AU - Lamont, Ronald F

AU - Hvidt, Niels Christian

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - We would like to thank Cauldwell and Bewley (1) for their encouraging comments regarding our recent manuscript 'Blame and guilt - a mixed methods study of obstetricians' and midwives' experiences and existential considerations after involvement in traumatic childbirth' (2). The manuscript is the first publication from a large interdisciplinary study, and more data and analyses will follow. While we agree that it is an important finding that 87% agreed with 'Memories of what happened to the patient kept troubling me for a long time after the event', we do not share the authors' interpretation of the item to be representative of intrusive memories. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

AB - We would like to thank Cauldwell and Bewley (1) for their encouraging comments regarding our recent manuscript 'Blame and guilt - a mixed methods study of obstetricians' and midwives' experiences and existential considerations after involvement in traumatic childbirth' (2). The manuscript is the first publication from a large interdisciplinary study, and more data and analyses will follow. While we agree that it is an important finding that 87% agreed with 'Memories of what happened to the patient kept troubling me for a long time after the event', we do not share the authors' interpretation of the item to be representative of intrusive memories. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

U2 - 10.1111/aogs.12935

DO - 10.1111/aogs.12935

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 27288838

SN - 0001-6349

VL - 95

SP - 1079

EP - 1080

JO - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

IS - 9

ER -

Healthcare professionals' perspectives on traumatic childbirth - interpreting the data

Abstract

Dokumenter og links

SDU link

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater