A lively debate has arisen about the need and the character of phenomenology - of phenomenology in general and of sports phenomenology in particular. This paper responds to Irena Martínková and Jim Parry who defended philosophical phenomenology against my critique of their book about phenomenological approaches to sport. Where the defense maintains the existence of one single and correct phenomenology, understood as a sort of existential philosophy, this paper argues for a diversity of different types of phenomenology and more concretely for a phenomenological method that goes back to phenomena.
|Bidragets oversatte titel||Har vi behov for en eksistensfilosofi af jernbanen? - Men hvorfor så for en filosofi af sporten?|
|Tidsskrift||Sport, Ethics and Philosophy|
|Status||Udgivet - 2014|