Haemodynamic implications of VA-ECMO vs. VA-ECMO plus Impella CP for cardiogenic shock in a large animal model

AIMS: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) with profound left ventricular (LV) failure is associated with inadequate LV emptying. To unload the LV, VA-ECMO can be combined with Impella CP (ECMELLA). We hypothesized that ECMELLA improves cardiac energetics compared with VA-ECMO in a porcine model of cardiogenic shock (CS).

METHODS AND RESULTS: Land-race pigs (weight 70 kg) were instrumented, including a LV conductance catheter and a carotid artery Doppler flow probe. CS was induced with embolization in the left main coronary artery. CS was defined as reduction of ≥50% in cardiac output or mixed oxygen saturation (SvO 2) or a SvO 2 < 30%. At CS VA-ECMO was initiated and embolization was continued until arterial pulse pressure was <10 mmHg. At this point, Impella CP was placed in the ECMELLA arm. Support was maintained for 4 h. CS was induced in 15 pigs (VA-ECMO n = 7, ECMELLA n = 8). At time of CS MAP was <45 mmHg in both groups, with no difference at 4 h (VA-ECMO 64 mmHg ± 11 vs. ECMELLA 55 mmHg ± 21, P = 0.08). Carotid blood flow and arterial lactate increased from CS and was similar in VA-ECMO and ECMELLA [239 mL/min ± 97 vs. 213 mL/min ± 133 (P = 0.6) and 5.2 ± 3.3 vs. 4.2 ± 2.9 mmol/ (P = 0.5)]. Pressure-volume area (PVA) was significantly higher with VA-ECMO compared with ECMELLA (9567 ± 1733 vs. 6921 ± 5036 mmHg × mL/min × 10 -3, P = 0.014). Total diureses was found to be lower in VA-ECMO compared with ECMELLA [248 mL (179-930) vs. 506 mL (418-2190); P = 0.005].

CONCLUSIONS: In a porcine model of CS, we found lower PVA, with the ECMELLA configuration compared with VA-ECMO, indicating better cardiac energetics without compromising systemic perfusion.