Abstract
The articles in this special issue consider the institutional foundations of the Union’s criminal policy – a highly critical question for the future development of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. The ratification of the Lisbon Treaty and the subsequent legal and political developments have entailed an unprecedented reinforcement of the powers of the EU’s criminal justice agencies Europol, Eurojust and, recently, the establishment of a novel criminal justice body – the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. On the basis of the Treaty mandate, the EU legislator has adopted important reforms such as the EPPO Regulation, and new Europol and Eurojust regulations. In light of these developments, this special issue explores via a multi-disciplinary investigation the extent to which the increased competences of the EU and the stronger presence of EU criminal justice agencies have transformed EU criminal law from an ‘intergovernmental’ regime to a ‘supranational’ and ‘integrated’ framework. We expect that this special issue will enhance further debate on EU criminal justice agencies, encourage novel paths to bridge the boundaries between disciplinary epistemic communities in the study of EU criminal justice and more broadly contribute to an advanced understanding of the role of law in social and political integration.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law |
Vol/bind | 28 |
Udgave nummer | 2 |
Sider (fra-til) | 155-163 |
ISSN | 1023-263X |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - apr. 2021 |
Udgivet eksternt | Ja |
Bibliografisk note
Funding Information:I am very grateful for the comments, support and constructive criticisms from Chris Harding and Christian Kaunert in initially designing this project and this special issue. The generous support from the Swedish Network of European Legal Studies (SNELS) in organizing the initial conference ‘Transnational Criminal Enforcement by EU Criminal Justice Agencies: from Cooperation to Integration?’ (held at Lund University in October 2019) which constitutes the basis for this special issue should also be acknowledged. The important contributions of Tomas Färndahl, Marja-Liisa Öberg, Michael Levi, Ester Herlin-Karnell, Christoffer Wong, Gert Vermeulen and Nicholas Franssen to the discussions at this conference should be particularly mentioned. Finally, the dedicated support from Thomas Biermeyer and Giulia Frinzi of the Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law for the project and their subsequent planning the production of this special issue is worthy of special recognition.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.