Global diffusion and deinstitutionalization of a controversial practice

Kerem Gurses, Ferran Giones, Kandarpkumar Mehta

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference-proceedingKonferenceabstrakt i proceedingsForskningpeer review

Resumé

We study the process of international diffusion, global contestation, and local deinstitutionalization of a controversial practice, identifying the mechanisms used by proponents and opponents of the practice across multiple institutional environments and constituents. We draw on international diffusion, deinstitutionalization, and power theory to study the emergence and diffusion of the third-party ownership practice in the soccer industry. We use an inductive case study combining archival and interview data to study the determinants of the international diffusion of the practice, the changes in the power structure in the market as the practice was adopted at a global scale, and finally the contestation and deinstitutionalization process that resulted from the ban of the practice. We find that the opacity of the practice can be a diffusion driver, locally and at the international level, nevertheless as the practice transforms the market structure and allows new actors to gain power, a global contestation is triggered through problematization and emotional resonance by insiders with institutional power positions in the market. This article advances in our understanding of the multilevel governance mechanisms and power dynamics that might support international diffusion but also contestation and eventual deinstitutionalization of a practice.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelAcademy of Management Proceedings
RedaktørerGuclu Atinc
ForlagAcademy of Management
Publikationsdato1. jul. 2018
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1. jul. 2018
BegivenhedAcademy of Management Anual Meeting: Improving Lives - Chicago, Chicago, USA
Varighed: 10. aug. 201814. aug. 2018
Konferencens nummer: 78
http://aom.org/annualmeeting/

Konference

KonferenceAcademy of Management Anual Meeting
Nummer78
LokationChicago
LandUSA
ByChicago
Periode10/08/201814/08/2018
Internetadresse
NavnAcademy of Management Proceedings
Nummer1
Vol/bind2018
ISSN2151-6561

Fingeraftryk

market
multi-level-governance
soccer
ban
driver
determinants
industry
interview

Citer dette

Gurses, K., Giones, F., & Mehta, K. (2018). Global diffusion and deinstitutionalization of a controversial practice. I G. Atinc (red.), Academy of Management Proceedings Academy of Management. Academy of Management Proceedings, Nr. 1, Bind. 2018 https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.11821abstract
Gurses, Kerem ; Giones, Ferran ; Mehta, Kandarpkumar. / Global diffusion and deinstitutionalization of a controversial practice. Academy of Management Proceedings. red. / Guclu Atinc. Academy of Management, 2018. (Academy of Management Proceedings; Nr. 1, Bind 2018).
@inbook{03a6f78273e94f8c8ed7af4ecf9e28ea,
title = "Global diffusion and deinstitutionalization of a controversial practice",
abstract = "We study the process of international diffusion, global contestation, and local deinstitutionalization of a controversial practice, identifying the mechanisms used by proponents and opponents of the practice across multiple institutional environments and constituents. We draw on international diffusion, deinstitutionalization, and power theory to study the emergence and diffusion of the third-party ownership practice in the soccer industry. We use an inductive case study combining archival and interview data to study the determinants of the international diffusion of the practice, the changes in the power structure in the market as the practice was adopted at a global scale, and finally the contestation and deinstitutionalization process that resulted from the ban of the practice. We find that the opacity of the practice can be a diffusion driver, locally and at the international level, nevertheless as the practice transforms the market structure and allows new actors to gain power, a global contestation is triggered through problematization and emotional resonance by insiders with institutional power positions in the market. This article advances in our understanding of the multilevel governance mechanisms and power dynamics that might support international diffusion but also contestation and eventual deinstitutionalization of a practice.",
author = "Kerem Gurses and Ferran Giones and Kandarpkumar Mehta",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/AMBPP.2018.11821abstract",
language = "English",
series = "Academy of Management Proceedings",
number = "1",
editor = "Guclu Atinc",
booktitle = "Academy of Management Proceedings",
publisher = "Academy of Management",

}

Gurses, K, Giones, F & Mehta, K 2018, Global diffusion and deinstitutionalization of a controversial practice. i G Atinc (red.), Academy of Management Proceedings. Academy of Management, Academy of Management Proceedings, nr. 1, bind 2018, Academy of Management Anual Meeting, Chicago, USA, 10/08/2018. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.11821abstract

Global diffusion and deinstitutionalization of a controversial practice. / Gurses, Kerem; Giones, Ferran; Mehta, Kandarpkumar.

Academy of Management Proceedings. red. / Guclu Atinc. Academy of Management, 2018. (Academy of Management Proceedings; Nr. 1, Bind 2018).

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference-proceedingKonferenceabstrakt i proceedingsForskningpeer review

TY - ABST

T1 - Global diffusion and deinstitutionalization of a controversial practice

AU - Gurses, Kerem

AU - Giones, Ferran

AU - Mehta, Kandarpkumar

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - We study the process of international diffusion, global contestation, and local deinstitutionalization of a controversial practice, identifying the mechanisms used by proponents and opponents of the practice across multiple institutional environments and constituents. We draw on international diffusion, deinstitutionalization, and power theory to study the emergence and diffusion of the third-party ownership practice in the soccer industry. We use an inductive case study combining archival and interview data to study the determinants of the international diffusion of the practice, the changes in the power structure in the market as the practice was adopted at a global scale, and finally the contestation and deinstitutionalization process that resulted from the ban of the practice. We find that the opacity of the practice can be a diffusion driver, locally and at the international level, nevertheless as the practice transforms the market structure and allows new actors to gain power, a global contestation is triggered through problematization and emotional resonance by insiders with institutional power positions in the market. This article advances in our understanding of the multilevel governance mechanisms and power dynamics that might support international diffusion but also contestation and eventual deinstitutionalization of a practice.

AB - We study the process of international diffusion, global contestation, and local deinstitutionalization of a controversial practice, identifying the mechanisms used by proponents and opponents of the practice across multiple institutional environments and constituents. We draw on international diffusion, deinstitutionalization, and power theory to study the emergence and diffusion of the third-party ownership practice in the soccer industry. We use an inductive case study combining archival and interview data to study the determinants of the international diffusion of the practice, the changes in the power structure in the market as the practice was adopted at a global scale, and finally the contestation and deinstitutionalization process that resulted from the ban of the practice. We find that the opacity of the practice can be a diffusion driver, locally and at the international level, nevertheless as the practice transforms the market structure and allows new actors to gain power, a global contestation is triggered through problematization and emotional resonance by insiders with institutional power positions in the market. This article advances in our understanding of the multilevel governance mechanisms and power dynamics that might support international diffusion but also contestation and eventual deinstitutionalization of a practice.

U2 - 10.5465/AMBPP.2018.11821abstract

DO - 10.5465/AMBPP.2018.11821abstract

M3 - Conference abstract in proceedings

T3 - Academy of Management Proceedings

BT - Academy of Management Proceedings

A2 - Atinc, Guclu

PB - Academy of Management

ER -

Gurses K, Giones F, Mehta K. Global diffusion and deinstitutionalization of a controversial practice. I Atinc G, red., Academy of Management Proceedings. Academy of Management. 2018. (Academy of Management Proceedings; Nr. 1, Bind 2018). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.11821abstract