Abstract
The world has entered the ‘second drone age’.1 Defined by the global proliferation of military Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) and weaponised commercial drones, this new era of drone warfare has seen, and will continue to see, both state and non-state actors competing for power in the skies above (and beyond) designated zones of conflict. Hostile actors, with threatening remotely operated air power components, now vie for command of the air against NATO and al- lied forces. Civilian populations are at increased risk in this adjusted state of war. Ethical controversies from the first drone age have been exacerbated by the widespread use of distant lethal robotics, making it difficult to distinguish between the perpetrators of drone atrocities and attacks or accidents. This ‘deniability’ has important political, legal, and strategic implications. Holding actors to account, or retaliating against belligerents, is difficult in this deniable, multi-user context, where similar, if not identical systems, are deployed by myriad disparate actors. The second drone age also poses broader implications for international security, stability, and Great Power politics. Decisions about who joins the ‘global drone club’ are not made by accident, especially where the transfer of military UAS is concerned. The unrestricted supply of armed UAS to surrogate, partner, and proxy actors by state suppliers – of which China is one of the most prolific – will influence the fate of nations. As recent ‘State versus State’ drone wars in the Caucasus and Libya show, the politically motivated supply of military UAS has contributed to international instability and conflict escalation. The supply of both commercial and military-grade remote technologies to non-state actors, allegedly by countries like Iran or through commercial shell companies, exacerbate the manifest threats present in this altered security environment. The relaxation of commercial drone regulations in reaction to COVID-19 will only exacerbate this problem as belligerents seek to move against perceived weak-points. Put simply, new ‘Drone Powers’, and the ‘new drone world’, present fundamentally different challenges to those faced during the first drone age.i
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Titel | A comprehensive approach to countering unmanned aircraft systems |
| Redaktører | Matthew Willis, André Haider, Daniel C. Teletin, Daniel Wagner |
| Udgivelsessted | Kalkar |
| Forlag | The Joint Air Power Competence Centre |
| Publikationsdato | 2021 |
| Sider | 481-505 |
| Kapitel | 26 |
| Status | Udgivet - 2021 |
| Begivenhed | Drone Warfare: Trends and Emerging Issues - Rothermere American Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, Storbritannien Varighed: 20. sep. 2018 → 21. sep. 2018 |
Workshop
| Workshop | Drone Warfare: Trends and Emerging Issues |
|---|---|
| Lokation | Rothermere American Institute, University of Oxford |
| Land/Område | Storbritannien |
| By | Oxford |
| Periode | 20/09/2018 → 21/09/2018 |
Fingeraftryk
Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Future threats: Military UAS, terrorist drones, and the dangers of the second drone age'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.Relaterede publikationer
-
Small states, great powers, and armed drones
Rogers, J., 2021, Small states and the new security environment. Brady, A.-M. & Thorhallsson, B. (red.). Springer, s. 59-71 (The World of Small States; Nr. 7).Publikation: Kapitel i bog/rapport/konference-proceeding › Kapitel i bog › Forskning › peer review
-
Drone Warfare: Distant Targets and Remote Killings
Rogers, J. & Holland Michel, A., 13. mar. 2020, The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Global Security Studies. Romaniuk, S., Thapa, M. & Marton, P. (red.). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 10 s.Publikation: Kapitel i bog/rapport/konference-proceeding › Encyklopædiartikel › Forskning › peer review
Åben adgang -
Soleimani helped turn Iran into one of the most effective proponents of remote warfare; his impact lives on
Rogers, J., 27. jan. 2020, I: UK Defence Journal .Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Bidrag til avis - Avisartikel
Åben adgang
Relaterede aktiviteter
-
The Darkside of Our Drone Future: Lessons from History
Rogers, J. (Underviser)
maj 2020Aktivitet: Foredrag og mundtlige bidrag › Foredrag og præsentationer i privat eller offentlig virksomhed
-
Arctic Drones and Arctic Security,
Rogers, J. (Underviser)
apr. 2020Aktivitet: Foredrag og mundtlige bidrag › Foredrag og præsentationer i privat eller offentlig virksomhed
-
Terrorist Drones: The Darkside of Our Drone Future
Rogers, J. (Underviser)
mar. 2020Aktivitet: Foredrag og mundtlige bidrag › Foredrag og præsentationer i privat eller offentlig virksomhed
Relaterede projekter
- 2 Afsluttet
-
VDA: The Vulnerabilities of the Drone Age
Rogers, J. (Projektdeltager)
05/07/2020 → 22/07/2022
Projekter: Projekt › Forskning
-
FDA: Future Drone Warfare
Rogers, J. (Projektdeltager)
01/05/2018 → 02/05/2022
Projekter: Projekt › Forskning
Relateret presse/medie
-
-
Report on Drone Warfare to UN Human Rights Council
Rogers, J.
06/07/2020 → 16/07/2020
7 elementer af Mediedækning
Presse/medie
-
Iran’s drone program: Changing the rules of Mideast proxy wars, RNA, 2020.
Rogers, J.
22/05/2020
1 Mediebidrag
Presse/medie
Relaterede impacts
-
Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions to the Human Rights Council Forty-fourth session’, A/HRC/44/38.
Rogers, J. (Deltager)
Impact: Politisk impact
Fil -
Citationsformater
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver