From conditions of equality to demands of justice: equal freedom, motivation and justification in Hobbes, Rousseau and Rawls

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

Equal freedom is the common starting point for most contractual theories of justice from Hobbes and Rousseau to Rawls. But while equal freedom defines a common starting point for these theories, this does not result in a general consensus on the conception of justice. On the contrary, different ways of conceptualizing the contractual starting point leads to different conceptions of the demands of justice. To fully understand the relationship between equal freedom and justice we therefore first need to explicate how and why the initial condition of equality is transformed into demands of justice. In this paper we discuss how this transformation takes place in the theories of Hobbes, Rousseau and Rawls, with particular emphasis on the vexed relationship between motivation and justification.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Vol/bind18
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)7-25
ISSN1369-8230
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2015

Citationsformater