Spring til hovednavigation Spring til søgning Spring til hovedindhold

Fracture risk and management of discontinuation of denosumab therapy: a systematic review and position statement by ECTS

  • Elena Tsourdi
  • , M Carola Zillikens
  • , Christian Meier
  • , Jean-Jacques Body
  • , Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez
  • , Athanasios D Anastasilakis
  • , Bo Abrahamsen
  • , Eugene McCloskey
  • , Lorenz C Hofbauer
  • , Nuria Guañabens
  • , Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch
  • , Stuart H Ralston
  • , Richard Eastell
  • , Jessica Pepe
  • , Andrea Palermo
  • , Bente Langdahl*
  • *Kontaktforfatter
  • Technische Universität Dresden Medical Center
  • Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam
  • University of Basel
  • University Hospital of Basel
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles
  • Lausanne University Hospital
  • University of Lausanne
  • 424 General Military Training Hospital
  • Holbæk Sygehus
  • University of Oxford
  • The University of Sheffield
  • University of Barcelona
  • Center for Biomarker Research in Medicine (CBmed)
  • Medical University of Graz
  • Queen Margaret University
  • Sapienza University of Rome
  • University Campus Bio-Medico
  • Aarhus Universitetshospital

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

CONTEXT: Denosumab discontinuation is characterized by an increase in bone turnover overriding pre-treatment status, a rapid bone loss in the majority and multiple vertebral fractures (VFx) in some patients.

METHODS: A working group of the European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS) performed an updated systematic review of existing literature on changes of bone turnover, bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture risk after denosumab discontinuation and provided advice on management based on expert opinion.

RESULTS: Important risk factors for multiple VFx following denosumab cessation are prevalent VFx, longer duration off therapy, greater gain in hip BMD during therapy, and greater loss of hip BMD after therapy according to a retrospective analysis of the FREEDOM Extension Study. Case series indicate that prior bisphosphonate therapy mitigates the biochemical rebound phenomenon after denosumab discontinuation, but it is uncertain whether this attenuation prevents BMD loss and fractures. Current evidence indicates partial efficacy of subsequent antiresorptive treatment with results seemingly dependent on duration of denosumab treatment.

CONCLUSIONS: A careful assessment of indications to start denosumab treatment is advised, especially for younger patients. A case for long-term treatment with denosumab can be made for patients at high fracture risk already on denosumab treatment given the favorable efficacy and safety profile. In case of denosumab discontinuation, alternative antiresorptive treatment should be initiated 6 months after the final denosumab injection. Assessment of bone turnover markers may help define the optimal regimen, pending results of ongoing RCTs. Patients having sustained VFx should be offered prompt treatment to reduce high bone turnover.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Vol/bind106
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)264–281
ISSN0021-972X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1. jan. 2021

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Fracture risk and management of discontinuation of denosumab therapy: a systematic review and position statement by ECTS'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater