TY - JOUR
T1 - Enhancing marine protected areas with effective ecological and environmental data integration
AU - Hoppit, George
AU - Nurkse, Kristiina
AU - Beleem, Imtiyaz
AU - Cadoni, Nicoletta
AU - Crowe, Tasman
AU - Bekaert, Matthieu
AU - Bongiorni, Lucia
AU - Dvorski, Kora
AU - Everaert, Gert
AU - Frau, Francesca
AU - Jernberg, Susanna
AU - Krvarić, Ana
AU - Kõivupuu, Anneliis
AU - Malovrazić, Nemanja
AU - Marchessaux, Guillaume
AU - Perschke, Myriam Johanna
AU - Petersen, H. Cecilie
AU - Quintana, Cintia Organo
AU - Raatikainen, Kaisa J.
AU - Sará, Gianluca
AU - Sicard, Maëlla
AU - Stevens, Martha
AU - Szava-Kovats, Robert
AU - Vaher, Annaleena
AU - Gerven, Annaïk Van
AU - Barboza, Francisco R.
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) play a critical role in marine conservation, but their effectiveness, among other things, depends on robust ecological and environmental data integration. This paper explores key gaps and suggests ways forward for evaluating MPA ecological functionality, emphasizing the integration of species and habitat functional roles, process-based, and ecosystem-based indicators to assess species roles and ecosystem processes when identifying areas for conservation and supporting their management and governance. Connectivity is highlighted as a fundamental process, ensuring MPAs contribute to broader ecological coherence rather than acting as isolated spatial units. Given the dynamic nature of marine ecosystems, temporal adaptability, supported by long-term monitoring and data-driven decision-making, is essential for maintaining resilience amid climate change and anthropogenic pressures. Additionally, leveraging local and traditional knowledge through stakeholder engagement enhances MPA governance and implementation. By combining a diverse range of ecological indicators to aid decision-making, we can improve MPA effectiveness, ensuring they sustain biodiversity, ecosystem services, and resilience in the face of environmental change.
AB - Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) play a critical role in marine conservation, but their effectiveness, among other things, depends on robust ecological and environmental data integration. This paper explores key gaps and suggests ways forward for evaluating MPA ecological functionality, emphasizing the integration of species and habitat functional roles, process-based, and ecosystem-based indicators to assess species roles and ecosystem processes when identifying areas for conservation and supporting their management and governance. Connectivity is highlighted as a fundamental process, ensuring MPAs contribute to broader ecological coherence rather than acting as isolated spatial units. Given the dynamic nature of marine ecosystems, temporal adaptability, supported by long-term monitoring and data-driven decision-making, is essential for maintaining resilience amid climate change and anthropogenic pressures. Additionally, leveraging local and traditional knowledge through stakeholder engagement enhances MPA governance and implementation. By combining a diverse range of ecological indicators to aid decision-making, we can improve MPA effectiveness, ensuring they sustain biodiversity, ecosystem services, and resilience in the face of environmental change.
KW - Connectivity
KW - Ecological indicators
KW - Ecosystem resilience
KW - Environmental management
KW - Marine protected areas
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114119
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114119
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:105014947260
SN - 1470-160X
VL - 178
JO - Ecological Indicators
JF - Ecological Indicators
M1 - 114119
ER -