Abstract
We show on the basis of German that prosodic patterns change in the course of a traditional sentence-list elicitation. Two frequent methods are analyzed: sentence-frame and syntax-frame elicitations. While only the sentences of the sentence-frame elicitation show an increase in speaking rate, both elicitation methods cause a drastic reduction in the alignment variability of nuclear pitch-accent rises. So, the starting point for the idea of segmental anchoring, i.e. the characteristic stable alignment of L and H targets, could primarily be due to a training effect based on the continuous production of analogously constructed or identical carrier sentences. Detailed pitch-accent analyses also offer alternative interpretations for anchoring patterns. Methodologically, in order to avoid training effects in pitchaccent production, our findings suggest using the syntax-frame method and short sentence lists of 40 items or less.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Titel | Proceedings of the 14th Interspeech Conference, Lyon, France |
| Antal sider | 5 |
| Publikationsdato | 2013 |
| Sider | 563-567 |
| Status | Udgivet - 2013 |
Fingeraftryk
Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Eliciting speech with sentence lists – a critical evaluation with special emphasis on segmental anchoring'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.Citationsformater
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver