EFSUMB Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound Part 3: Endorectal, Endoanal and Perineal Ultrasound

Dieter Nuernberg, Adrian Saftoiu*, Ana Paula Barreiros, Eike Burmester, Elena Tatiana Ivan, Dirk-André Clevert, Christoph F Dietrich, Odd Helge Gilja, Torben Lorentzen, Giovanni Maconi, Ismail Mihmanli, Christian Pallson Nolsoe, Frank Pfeffer, Søren Rafael Rafaelsen, Zeno Sparchez, Peter Vilmann, Jo Erling Riise Waage

*Kontaktforfatter for dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

84 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

This article represents part 3 of the EFSUMB Recommendations and Guidelines for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound (GIUS). It provides an overview of the examination techniques recommended by experts in the field of endorectal/endoanal ultrasound (ERUS/EAUS), as well as perineal ultrasound (PNUS). The most important indications are rectal tumors and inflammatory diseases like fistula and abscesses in patients with or without inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). PNUS sometimes is more flexible and convenient compared to ERUS. However, the technique of ERUS is quite well established, especially for the staging of rectal cancer. EAUS also gained ground in the evaluation of perianal diseases like fistulas, abscesses and incontinence. For the staging of perirectal tumors, the use of PNUS in addition to conventional ERUS could be recommended. For the staging of anal carcinomas, PNUS can be a good option because of the higher resolution. Both ERUS and PNUS are considered excellent guidance methods for invasive interventions, such as the drainage of fluids or targeted biopsy of tissue lesions. For abscess detection and evaluation, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) also helps in therapy planning.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftUltrasound International Open
Vol/bind5
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)E34-E51
ISSN2509-596X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2019

Fingeraftryk

Rectal Neoplasms
Neoplasm Staging
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Guidelines

Citer dette

Nuernberg, D., Saftoiu, A., Barreiros, A. P., Burmester, E., Ivan, E. T., Clevert, D-A., ... Waage, J. E. R. (2019). EFSUMB Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound Part 3: Endorectal, Endoanal and Perineal Ultrasound. Ultrasound International Open, 5(1), E34-E51. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0825-6708
Nuernberg, Dieter ; Saftoiu, Adrian ; Barreiros, Ana Paula ; Burmester, Eike ; Ivan, Elena Tatiana ; Clevert, Dirk-André ; Dietrich, Christoph F ; Gilja, Odd Helge ; Lorentzen, Torben ; Maconi, Giovanni ; Mihmanli, Ismail ; Nolsoe, Christian Pallson ; Pfeffer, Frank ; Rafaelsen, Søren Rafael ; Sparchez, Zeno ; Vilmann, Peter ; Waage, Jo Erling Riise. / EFSUMB Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound Part 3 : Endorectal, Endoanal and Perineal Ultrasound. I: Ultrasound International Open. 2019 ; Bind 5, Nr. 1. s. E34-E51.
@article{05606ff6b4bc4c67933354940808f768,
title = "EFSUMB Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound Part 3: Endorectal, Endoanal and Perineal Ultrasound",
abstract = "This article represents part 3 of the EFSUMB Recommendations and Guidelines for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound (GIUS). It provides an overview of the examination techniques recommended by experts in the field of endorectal/endoanal ultrasound (ERUS/EAUS), as well as perineal ultrasound (PNUS). The most important indications are rectal tumors and inflammatory diseases like fistula and abscesses in patients with or without inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). PNUS sometimes is more flexible and convenient compared to ERUS. However, the technique of ERUS is quite well established, especially for the staging of rectal cancer. EAUS also gained ground in the evaluation of perianal diseases like fistulas, abscesses and incontinence. For the staging of perirectal tumors, the use of PNUS in addition to conventional ERUS could be recommended. For the staging of anal carcinomas, PNUS can be a good option because of the higher resolution. Both ERUS and PNUS are considered excellent guidance methods for invasive interventions, such as the drainage of fluids or targeted biopsy of tissue lesions. For abscess detection and evaluation, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) also helps in therapy planning.",
author = "Dieter Nuernberg and Adrian Saftoiu and Barreiros, {Ana Paula} and Eike Burmester and Ivan, {Elena Tatiana} and Dirk-Andr{\'e} Clevert and Dietrich, {Christoph F} and Gilja, {Odd Helge} and Torben Lorentzen and Giovanni Maconi and Ismail Mihmanli and Nolsoe, {Christian Pallson} and Frank Pfeffer and Rafaelsen, {S{\o}ren Rafael} and Zeno Sparchez and Peter Vilmann and Waage, {Jo Erling Riise}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1055/a-0825-6708",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "E34--E51",
journal = "Ultrasound International Open",
issn = "2199-7152",
publisher = "GeorgThieme Verlag",
number = "1",

}

Nuernberg, D, Saftoiu, A, Barreiros, AP, Burmester, E, Ivan, ET, Clevert, D-A, Dietrich, CF, Gilja, OH, Lorentzen, T, Maconi, G, Mihmanli, I, Nolsoe, CP, Pfeffer, F, Rafaelsen, SR, Sparchez, Z, Vilmann, P & Waage, JER 2019, 'EFSUMB Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound Part 3: Endorectal, Endoanal and Perineal Ultrasound', Ultrasound International Open, bind 5, nr. 1, s. E34-E51. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0825-6708

EFSUMB Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound Part 3 : Endorectal, Endoanal and Perineal Ultrasound. / Nuernberg, Dieter; Saftoiu, Adrian; Barreiros, Ana Paula; Burmester, Eike; Ivan, Elena Tatiana; Clevert, Dirk-André; Dietrich, Christoph F; Gilja, Odd Helge; Lorentzen, Torben; Maconi, Giovanni; Mihmanli, Ismail; Nolsoe, Christian Pallson; Pfeffer, Frank; Rafaelsen, Søren Rafael; Sparchez, Zeno; Vilmann, Peter; Waage, Jo Erling Riise.

I: Ultrasound International Open, Bind 5, Nr. 1, 01.2019, s. E34-E51.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - EFSUMB Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound Part 3

T2 - Endorectal, Endoanal and Perineal Ultrasound

AU - Nuernberg, Dieter

AU - Saftoiu, Adrian

AU - Barreiros, Ana Paula

AU - Burmester, Eike

AU - Ivan, Elena Tatiana

AU - Clevert, Dirk-André

AU - Dietrich, Christoph F

AU - Gilja, Odd Helge

AU - Lorentzen, Torben

AU - Maconi, Giovanni

AU - Mihmanli, Ismail

AU - Nolsoe, Christian Pallson

AU - Pfeffer, Frank

AU - Rafaelsen, Søren Rafael

AU - Sparchez, Zeno

AU - Vilmann, Peter

AU - Waage, Jo Erling Riise

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - This article represents part 3 of the EFSUMB Recommendations and Guidelines for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound (GIUS). It provides an overview of the examination techniques recommended by experts in the field of endorectal/endoanal ultrasound (ERUS/EAUS), as well as perineal ultrasound (PNUS). The most important indications are rectal tumors and inflammatory diseases like fistula and abscesses in patients with or without inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). PNUS sometimes is more flexible and convenient compared to ERUS. However, the technique of ERUS is quite well established, especially for the staging of rectal cancer. EAUS also gained ground in the evaluation of perianal diseases like fistulas, abscesses and incontinence. For the staging of perirectal tumors, the use of PNUS in addition to conventional ERUS could be recommended. For the staging of anal carcinomas, PNUS can be a good option because of the higher resolution. Both ERUS and PNUS are considered excellent guidance methods for invasive interventions, such as the drainage of fluids or targeted biopsy of tissue lesions. For abscess detection and evaluation, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) also helps in therapy planning.

AB - This article represents part 3 of the EFSUMB Recommendations and Guidelines for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound (GIUS). It provides an overview of the examination techniques recommended by experts in the field of endorectal/endoanal ultrasound (ERUS/EAUS), as well as perineal ultrasound (PNUS). The most important indications are rectal tumors and inflammatory diseases like fistula and abscesses in patients with or without inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). PNUS sometimes is more flexible and convenient compared to ERUS. However, the technique of ERUS is quite well established, especially for the staging of rectal cancer. EAUS also gained ground in the evaluation of perianal diseases like fistulas, abscesses and incontinence. For the staging of perirectal tumors, the use of PNUS in addition to conventional ERUS could be recommended. For the staging of anal carcinomas, PNUS can be a good option because of the higher resolution. Both ERUS and PNUS are considered excellent guidance methods for invasive interventions, such as the drainage of fluids or targeted biopsy of tissue lesions. For abscess detection and evaluation, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) also helps in therapy planning.

U2 - 10.1055/a-0825-6708

DO - 10.1055/a-0825-6708

M3 - Review

C2 - 30729231

VL - 5

SP - E34-E51

JO - Ultrasound International Open

JF - Ultrasound International Open

SN - 2199-7152

IS - 1

ER -