TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of individual differences, society, and culture on youth-rated problems and strengths in 38 societies
AU - Ivanova, Masha Y.
AU - Achenbach, Thomas M.
AU - Turner, Lori
AU - Almqvist, Fredrik
AU - Begovac, Ivan
AU - Bilenberg, Niels
AU - Bird, Hector
AU - Broberg, Anders G.
AU - Córdova Calderón, Mery A.
AU - Chahed, Myriam
AU - Dang, Hoang Minh
AU - Dobrean, Anca
AU - Döpfner, Mandred
AU - Erol, Nese
AU - Forns, Maria
AU - Guðmundsson, Halldór S.
AU - Hannesdóttir, Helga
AU - Hewitt-Ramirez, Nohelia
AU - Kanbayashi, Yasuko
AU - Karki, Suyen
AU - Koot, Hans M.
AU - Lambert, Michael C.
AU - Leung, Patrick
AU - Magai, Dorcas N.
AU - Maggiolini, Alfio
AU - Metzke, Christa Winkler
AU - Minaei, Asghar
AU - Monzani da Rocha, Marina
AU - Moreira, Paulo A.S.
AU - Mulatu, Mesfin S.
AU - Nøvik, Torunn Stene
AU - Oh, Kyung Ja
AU - Petot, Djaouida
AU - Petot, Jean Michel
AU - Pisa, Cecilia
AU - Pomalima, Rolando
AU - Roussos, Alexandra
AU - Rudan, Vlasta
AU - Sawyer, Michael G.
AU - Shahini, Mimoza
AU - Simsek, Zeynep
AU - Steinhausen, Hans Christoph
AU - Verhulst, Frank C.
AU - Weintraub, Sheila
AU - Weiss, Bahr
AU - Wolanczyk, Tomasz
AU - Zhang, Eugene Yuqing
AU - Zilber, Nelly
AU - Žukauskienė, Rita
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Background: Clinicians increasingly serve youths from societal/cultural backgrounds different from their own. This raises questions about how to interpret what such youths report. Rescorla et al. (2019, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 28, 1107) found that much more variance in 72,493 parents’ ratings of their offspring’s mental health problems was accounted for by individual differences than by societal or cultural differences. Although parents’ reports are essential for clinical assessment of their offspring, they reflect parents’ perceptions of the offspring. Consequently, clinical assessment also requires self-reports from the offspring themselves. To test effects of individual differences, society, and culture on youths’ self-ratings of their problems and strengths, we analyzed Youth Self-Report (YSR) scores for 39,849 11–17 year olds in 38 societies. Methods: Indigenous researchers obtained YSR self-ratings from population samples of youths in 38 societies representing 10 culture cluster identified in the Global Leadership and Organizational Behavioral Effectiveness study. Hierarchical linear modeling of scores on 17 problem scales and one strengths scale estimated the percent of variance accounted for by individual differences (including measurement error), society, and culture cluster. ANOVAs tested age and gender effects. Results: Averaged across the 17 problem scales, individual differences accounted for 92.5% of variance, societal differences 6.0%, and cultural differences 1.5%. For strengths, individual differences accounted for 83.4% of variance, societal differences 10.1%, and cultural differences 6.5%. Age and gender had very small effects. Conclusions: Like parents’ ratings, youths’ self-ratings of problems were affected much more by individual differences than societal/cultural differences. Most variance in self-rated strengths also reflected individual differences, but societal/cultural effects were larger than for problems, suggesting greater influence of social desirability. The clinical significance of individual differences in youths’ self-reports should thus not be minimized by societal/cultural differences, which—while important—can be taken into account with appropriate norms, as can gender and age differences.
AB - Background: Clinicians increasingly serve youths from societal/cultural backgrounds different from their own. This raises questions about how to interpret what such youths report. Rescorla et al. (2019, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 28, 1107) found that much more variance in 72,493 parents’ ratings of their offspring’s mental health problems was accounted for by individual differences than by societal or cultural differences. Although parents’ reports are essential for clinical assessment of their offspring, they reflect parents’ perceptions of the offspring. Consequently, clinical assessment also requires self-reports from the offspring themselves. To test effects of individual differences, society, and culture on youths’ self-ratings of their problems and strengths, we analyzed Youth Self-Report (YSR) scores for 39,849 11–17 year olds in 38 societies. Methods: Indigenous researchers obtained YSR self-ratings from population samples of youths in 38 societies representing 10 culture cluster identified in the Global Leadership and Organizational Behavioral Effectiveness study. Hierarchical linear modeling of scores on 17 problem scales and one strengths scale estimated the percent of variance accounted for by individual differences (including measurement error), society, and culture cluster. ANOVAs tested age and gender effects. Results: Averaged across the 17 problem scales, individual differences accounted for 92.5% of variance, societal differences 6.0%, and cultural differences 1.5%. For strengths, individual differences accounted for 83.4% of variance, societal differences 10.1%, and cultural differences 6.5%. Age and gender had very small effects. Conclusions: Like parents’ ratings, youths’ self-ratings of problems were affected much more by individual differences than societal/cultural differences. Most variance in self-rated strengths also reflected individual differences, but societal/cultural effects were larger than for problems, suggesting greater influence of social desirability. The clinical significance of individual differences in youths’ self-reports should thus not be minimized by societal/cultural differences, which—while important—can be taken into account with appropriate norms, as can gender and age differences.
KW - Individual differences
KW - multicultural
KW - psychopathology
KW - strengths
KW - Youth Self-Report
KW - Parents/psychology
KW - Humans
KW - Self Report
KW - Adolescent
KW - Individuality
KW - Child
U2 - 10.1111/jcpp.13569
DO - 10.1111/jcpp.13569
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35167140
AN - SCOPUS:85124593069
SN - 0021-9630
VL - 63
SP - 1297
EP - 1307
JO - Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines
JF - Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines
IS - 11
ER -