Spring til hovednavigation Spring til søgning Spring til hovedindhold

Diagnostic capacity of BAP1 and MTAP in cytology from effusions and biopsy in mesothelioma

  • Louise Andersen Lynggård
  • , Vasiliki Panou
  • , Weronika Szejniuk
  • , Oluf Dimitri Røe
  • , Christos Meristoudis*
  • *Kontaktforfatter
  • Aalborg Universitetshospital
  • Aalborg Universitet
  • Nord-Trøndelag Health Trust
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

107 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: Serous effusion is often the first sign of mesothelioma. Diagnosis based on cytologic material from the effusions remains controversial and complementary biopsy is usually required. However, obtaining representative tissue sample may be challenging, while obtaining cytologic material is a minimally invasive procedure, providing potential for an earlier diagnosis. Loss of BRCA1-associated protein (BAP1), combined with loss of methylthionadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) detected by immunohistochemistry, have shown to be reliable markers in the diagnosis of mesothelioma on histologic sections. Here we evaluate the value of these biomarkers in cytologic specimens. Materials and methods: The BAP1 and MTAP expression in specimens of 162 mesothelioma patients (156 pleural, 6 peritoneal)—71 cytologic, 91 histologic (44 epithelioid, 31 biphasic, 16 sarcomatoid)—and 20 patients with reactive mesothelial proliferations were investigated. Results: The loss of BAP1 and/or MTAP was highly sensitive and specific in differentiating mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial proliferations, with no significant difference between pleural effusions and biopsies, specificity of 100% in both and a sensitivity of 78.9% and 80.2%, respectively (P = 0.3). There was a 100% concordance of the expression of BAP1 and MTAP in cytologic and corresponding histopathologic samples. Loss of BAP1 and/or MTAP in histologic sections discriminated sarcomatoid, biphasic, and epithelioid mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial proliferations with a sensitivity of 81.2%, 83.9%, and 77.3% respectively. Conclusion: Loss of expression of BAP1 and/or MTAP differentiated mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial proliferations with excellent specificity and high sensitivity in cytologic samples, comparable to histopathologic sections.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of the American Society of Cytopathology
Vol/bind11
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)385-393
ISSN2213-2945
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1. nov. 2022

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
Partially funded by the Liaison Committee between the Central Norway Regional Health Authority (RHA) and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).

Finansiering

Partially funded by the Liaison Committee between the Central Norway Regional Health Authority (RHA) and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Diagnostic capacity of BAP1 and MTAP in cytology from effusions and biopsy in mesothelioma'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater