The Goldilocks Work Principle expresses that productive work should be redesigned to comprise physical behaviors of different intensities in a composition promoting workers’ health and fitness. This study is the first to assess the feasibility of redesigning work in an industrial setting according to the Goldilocks Work Principle. We recruited workers (n = 20) from a brewery in Den-mark, and we conducted a participatory 16‐week intervention including a workshop and two con-sultations. The workshop aimed to support the workers in modifying their work, while the consul-tations assisted the eventual implementation. Feasibility was evaluated as per three aspects: (1) developing modifications of work, (2) implementing these modifications, and (3) changing physical behavior and self‐reported fatigue, pain and energy. The three aspects were addressed through rec-ords completed by the workers, measurements of workers’ physical behavior and intensity during ‘control’ workdays (i.e., usual work) and ‘intervention’ workdays (i.e., modified work), and self-reported fatigue, pain and energy level following both types of workday. Five modifications to work were developed, and three of these five modifications were implemented. To some extent, physical behavior and intensity changed as intended during ‘intervention’ workdays compared to ‘control’ workdays. Workers were also less fatigued, had less pain, and had more energy after ‘intervention’ workdays. These results suggest that it is feasible to develop and implement modified work based on the Goldilocks Work Principle among industrial workers. However, we also identified several barriers to the implementation of such modifications.
|Tidsskrift||International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health|
|Status||Udgivet - 1. maj 2021|
Bibliografisk noteFunding Information:
Funding: This research was funded by the Danish Working Environment Research Fund (grant no. 18‐ 2018‐03).