Corrigendum to “Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer is not prognostic factor for 30-day mortality (a nationwide prospective cohort study)” (International Journal of Surgery (2019) 72 (47–54), (S1743919119302833), (10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.017))

Sergej Zogovic*, Anders Bo Bojesen, Shadi Andos, Frank Viborg Mortensen

*Kontaktforfatter for dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

Abstrakt

The authors regret that it has come to their attention that there is an error in a part of Table 1b. In the process of revising Table 1b, the dichotomous categories have been swapped for diagnoses and prescription drugs. This means that the percentages reported reflect the proportion of patients without a certain disease or prescription drug instead of the proportion of patients suffering from this disease or taking the medication. This does not have any impact on the conclusions, it merely gives wrong impression of the patient group. [Figure presented] The highlighted data above should be replaced with the following data: [Figure presented] The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Surgery
Vol/bind75
Sider (fra-til)11-12
Antal sider2
ISSN1743-9191
DOI
StatusUdgivet - mar. 2020

Fingeraftryk Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Corrigendum to “Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer is not prognostic factor for 30-day mortality (a nationwide prospective cohort study)” (International Journal of Surgery (2019) 72 (47–54), (S1743919119302833), (10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.017))'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater