TY - GEN
T1 - Coordination of the Clinical Care Trajectories of Acutely Hospitalised Older People
T2 - A Qualitative Study on Healthcare Professionals Across Sectors
AU - Hjuler Persson, Maiken
PY - 2022/4/11
Y1 - 2022/4/11
N2 - Introduction: Despite the initiatives to improve the coordination of care across health sectors and professions, studies show that challenges persist. This thesis focuses on the clinical care trajectories of acutely hospitalised people aged 65 years or over. The number of older people with multimorbidities and complex care needs is increasing, and the siloed nature of health care and increasing specialisation mean that multiple healthcare providers are often involved in care. This thesis explores the perspectives and practices of healthcare professionals across sectors and professions and contributes knowledge on how clinical care trajectories may be improved.Aim and objectives: The thesis focuses on HCPs from a range of health sectors and aims to explore, identify and analyse the prerequisites for improving the CCTs of older people experiencing acute hospitalisation. The thesis is based on three scientific studies with the following aims:- Study I: To identify and analyse HCPs’ perspectives and approaches to intersectoral care coordination of acutely hospitalised older people.- Study II: To explore and analyse how HCPs’ interactions and practice influence older people’s CCTs when admitted to and emergency department (ED) and the challenges that emerges.-Study III: To analyse the perspectives of HCPs from various sectors and professions on the barriers and facilitators of the coordination of the acute CCTs of older people.Methods: The studies presented in this thesis are based on a range of qualitative research methods. In Study I, individual interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals (n = 13) across health sectors. Study II was based on observations and interviews in the clinical care trajectories (n = 7) of older people who had been acutely hospitalised. Study III was based on two focus groups comprising a variety of healthcare professionals (n = 23) in which a clinical care trajectory based on empirical data from Study I and II was discussed.Results: The individual interviews in Study I revealed the intersectoral work culture differences and diverse care approaches and practices influencing the coordination of care. Four themes affecting the coordination of care emerged from the analysis: (i) organisational factors, (ii) approaches to care, (iii) communication and knowledge, and (iv) relations.Study II revealed a dissonance between system logics and the goal of person-centered care. This clash disturbs the healthcare practice and service culture with negative effect on the care and coordination of the clinical care trajectory limiting the opportunity for holistic care. The analysis of the healthcare practice revealed four themes: (i) “The end justifies the means – ‘I know what is best for you’”, (ii) “Basic needs of care overruled by system effectiveness”, (iii) “Treatment as a bargain”, and (iv) “Healthcare professionals as solo detectives”.In Study III, two themes emerged from the analysis of healthcare professionals’ perspectives: (i) familiarity and relationships between professions and (ii) reduced care practices. The results show that there is limited familiarity between healthcare professions. Moreover, New Public Management (NPM) principles emphasise high efficiency and specialisation, resulting in health care becoming less humanistic and more checklist oriented, leaving little room for person-centered care and flexibility across the clinical care trajectory.Conclusion: To understand why gaps in the intersectoral and interprofessional coordination of care occur, it is crucial to recognise the complexity of health care arising from for example sectoral and professional boundaries and specialisation. The results of this thesis underline the need to approach the intersectoral and interdisciplinary coordination of care from multiple levels to integrate healthcare services, improve the clinical care trajectories of older people and embrace holistic, person-centered care, allowing focus to be on ‘the entire person’ and context. At the structural and organisational levels, there should be less focus on measures and checklists, and more resources should be prioritised to create stronger familiarity and interprofessional relationships across sectors to improve the care coordination. Respectful, empathic and holistic care that meets the entirely of an individual’s needs rather than simply focusing on isolated problems should be universally embedded in healthcare practices, beginning with socialisation during educational programs.
AB - Introduction: Despite the initiatives to improve the coordination of care across health sectors and professions, studies show that challenges persist. This thesis focuses on the clinical care trajectories of acutely hospitalised people aged 65 years or over. The number of older people with multimorbidities and complex care needs is increasing, and the siloed nature of health care and increasing specialisation mean that multiple healthcare providers are often involved in care. This thesis explores the perspectives and practices of healthcare professionals across sectors and professions and contributes knowledge on how clinical care trajectories may be improved.Aim and objectives: The thesis focuses on HCPs from a range of health sectors and aims to explore, identify and analyse the prerequisites for improving the CCTs of older people experiencing acute hospitalisation. The thesis is based on three scientific studies with the following aims:- Study I: To identify and analyse HCPs’ perspectives and approaches to intersectoral care coordination of acutely hospitalised older people.- Study II: To explore and analyse how HCPs’ interactions and practice influence older people’s CCTs when admitted to and emergency department (ED) and the challenges that emerges.-Study III: To analyse the perspectives of HCPs from various sectors and professions on the barriers and facilitators of the coordination of the acute CCTs of older people.Methods: The studies presented in this thesis are based on a range of qualitative research methods. In Study I, individual interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals (n = 13) across health sectors. Study II was based on observations and interviews in the clinical care trajectories (n = 7) of older people who had been acutely hospitalised. Study III was based on two focus groups comprising a variety of healthcare professionals (n = 23) in which a clinical care trajectory based on empirical data from Study I and II was discussed.Results: The individual interviews in Study I revealed the intersectoral work culture differences and diverse care approaches and practices influencing the coordination of care. Four themes affecting the coordination of care emerged from the analysis: (i) organisational factors, (ii) approaches to care, (iii) communication and knowledge, and (iv) relations.Study II revealed a dissonance between system logics and the goal of person-centered care. This clash disturbs the healthcare practice and service culture with negative effect on the care and coordination of the clinical care trajectory limiting the opportunity for holistic care. The analysis of the healthcare practice revealed four themes: (i) “The end justifies the means – ‘I know what is best for you’”, (ii) “Basic needs of care overruled by system effectiveness”, (iii) “Treatment as a bargain”, and (iv) “Healthcare professionals as solo detectives”.In Study III, two themes emerged from the analysis of healthcare professionals’ perspectives: (i) familiarity and relationships between professions and (ii) reduced care practices. The results show that there is limited familiarity between healthcare professions. Moreover, New Public Management (NPM) principles emphasise high efficiency and specialisation, resulting in health care becoming less humanistic and more checklist oriented, leaving little room for person-centered care and flexibility across the clinical care trajectory.Conclusion: To understand why gaps in the intersectoral and interprofessional coordination of care occur, it is crucial to recognise the complexity of health care arising from for example sectoral and professional boundaries and specialisation. The results of this thesis underline the need to approach the intersectoral and interdisciplinary coordination of care from multiple levels to integrate healthcare services, improve the clinical care trajectories of older people and embrace holistic, person-centered care, allowing focus to be on ‘the entire person’ and context. At the structural and organisational levels, there should be less focus on measures and checklists, and more resources should be prioritised to create stronger familiarity and interprofessional relationships across sectors to improve the care coordination. Respectful, empathic and holistic care that meets the entirely of an individual’s needs rather than simply focusing on isolated problems should be universally embedded in healthcare practices, beginning with socialisation during educational programs.
U2 - 10.21996/dh7j-z661
DO - 10.21996/dh7j-z661
M3 - Ph.D. thesis
PB - Syddansk Universitet. Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet
ER -