Contested spacing

International non-profit organizations and the mobility of asylum seekers

Publikation: Konferencebidrag uden forlag/tidsskriftPaperForskningpeer review

Resumé

The importance of examining space from an organizational standpoint is timely, not the least because the use of this concept has critical and often unintended social, and political effects (Mengis, Nicolini & Gorli, 2016). The global refugee crisis following the post-2015 Syrian conflict is perhaps one indicative situation of the highly contested ways in which international non-profit organizations (INGOs) create spaces for their organizational activities (e.g., build informal settlements to provide emergency aid), and thus affect how individuals (e.g., asylum seekers) get re-settled, confined to, or even restricted from living in such spaces. These matters are relevant since in the contexts where both the opportunities to move freely and being at peace are challenged, space is not only a neutral structure in which such contested organizing takes place (Mengis et al., 2016). Rather, it is a process consisting of various daily practices (Beyes & Steyaert, 2012) that, together with other interconnected, yet distant communicative events, help constitute organizations in distinct ways. The aim of this paper is therefore to examine how different spacing practices of organizations such as INGOs working in regions that deal with massive influxes of forced migration are constitutive of organizing and thereby contribute to or limit the mobility of asylum seekers.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato2018
StatusUdgivet - 2018
BegivenhedEGOS - Tallin, Estland
Varighed: 5. jul. 20187. jul. 2018
Konferencens nummer: 34th

Konference

KonferenceEGOS
Nummer34th
LandEstland
ByTallin
Periode05/07/201807/07/2018

Fingeraftryk

asylum seeker
non-profit-organization
refugee
peace
migration
event

Citer dette

@conference{4968e6fe4af742de8fb70f274928aa24,
title = "Contested spacing: International non-profit organizations and the mobility of asylum seekers",
abstract = "The importance of examining space from an organizational standpoint is timely, not the least because the use of this concept has critical and often unintended social, and political effects (Mengis, Nicolini & Gorli, 2016). The global refugee crisis following the post-2015 Syrian conflict is perhaps one indicative situation of the highly contested ways in which international non-profit organizations (INGOs) create spaces for their organizational activities (e.g., build informal settlements to provide emergency aid), and thus affect how individuals (e.g., asylum seekers) get re-settled, confined to, or even restricted from living in such spaces. These matters are relevant since in the contexts where both the opportunities to move freely and being at peace are challenged, space is not only a neutral structure in which such contested organizing takes place (Mengis et al., 2016). Rather, it is a process consisting of various daily practices (Beyes & Steyaert, 2012) that, together with other interconnected, yet distant communicative events, help constitute organizations in distinct ways. The aim of this paper is therefore to examine how different spacing practices of organizations such as INGOs working in regions that deal with massive influxes of forced migration are constitutive of organizing and thereby contribute to or limit the mobility of asylum seekers.",
author = "Albu, {Oana Brindusa}",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
note = "EGOS ; Conference date: 05-07-2018 Through 07-07-2018",

}

Albu, OB 2018, 'Contested spacing: International non-profit organizations and the mobility of asylum seekers' Paper fremlagt ved EGOS, Tallin, Estland, 05/07/2018 - 07/07/2018, .

Contested spacing : International non-profit organizations and the mobility of asylum seekers. / Albu, Oana Brindusa.

2018. Afhandling præsenteret på EGOS, Tallin, Estland.

Publikation: Konferencebidrag uden forlag/tidsskriftPaperForskningpeer review

TY - CONF

T1 - Contested spacing

T2 - International non-profit organizations and the mobility of asylum seekers

AU - Albu, Oana Brindusa

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The importance of examining space from an organizational standpoint is timely, not the least because the use of this concept has critical and often unintended social, and political effects (Mengis, Nicolini & Gorli, 2016). The global refugee crisis following the post-2015 Syrian conflict is perhaps one indicative situation of the highly contested ways in which international non-profit organizations (INGOs) create spaces for their organizational activities (e.g., build informal settlements to provide emergency aid), and thus affect how individuals (e.g., asylum seekers) get re-settled, confined to, or even restricted from living in such spaces. These matters are relevant since in the contexts where both the opportunities to move freely and being at peace are challenged, space is not only a neutral structure in which such contested organizing takes place (Mengis et al., 2016). Rather, it is a process consisting of various daily practices (Beyes & Steyaert, 2012) that, together with other interconnected, yet distant communicative events, help constitute organizations in distinct ways. The aim of this paper is therefore to examine how different spacing practices of organizations such as INGOs working in regions that deal with massive influxes of forced migration are constitutive of organizing and thereby contribute to or limit the mobility of asylum seekers.

AB - The importance of examining space from an organizational standpoint is timely, not the least because the use of this concept has critical and often unintended social, and political effects (Mengis, Nicolini & Gorli, 2016). The global refugee crisis following the post-2015 Syrian conflict is perhaps one indicative situation of the highly contested ways in which international non-profit organizations (INGOs) create spaces for their organizational activities (e.g., build informal settlements to provide emergency aid), and thus affect how individuals (e.g., asylum seekers) get re-settled, confined to, or even restricted from living in such spaces. These matters are relevant since in the contexts where both the opportunities to move freely and being at peace are challenged, space is not only a neutral structure in which such contested organizing takes place (Mengis et al., 2016). Rather, it is a process consisting of various daily practices (Beyes & Steyaert, 2012) that, together with other interconnected, yet distant communicative events, help constitute organizations in distinct ways. The aim of this paper is therefore to examine how different spacing practices of organizations such as INGOs working in regions that deal with massive influxes of forced migration are constitutive of organizing and thereby contribute to or limit the mobility of asylum seekers.

M3 - Paper

ER -