Changing masculinity, one ad at a time

Gry Høngsmark Knudsen*, Lars Pynt Andersen

*Kontaktforfatter for dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


This paper takes a rhetorical perspective on how ads address the current debate of toxic masculinity and attempt to change its hegemonic ideals. We compare rhetorical strategies in two purpose branding campaigns, Lynx's Is it ok for guys (2017) and Gillette's The Best a Man Can Be (2019), to demonstrate how respective uses of formal and narrative tropes create vastly different narratives about masculinity and therefore also very different audience agency. We argue that Gillette repeats older versions of hegemonic masculinity ideals and call for men to take responsibility and act as protector of the weak, whereas Lynx invites the audience to embrace and identify with less stereotypical identities. We suggest that Gillette's polemical rhetorical approach may generate more public debate on the issue of toxic masculinity, while Lynx's approach builds on a more embracing strategy that encourages the audience to empathise with non-stereotypical forms of masculinity.

TidsskriftWestminster Papers in Communication and Culture
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)63-78
StatusUdgivet - jul. 2020
Udgivet eksterntJa

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
We thank Marketing Lecturer Toms Kreicberg for making us aware of the Lynx campaign.

Fingeraftryk Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Changing masculinity, one ad at a time'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.