Burden-sharing in NATO: The Trump effect won’t last

Publikation: Monografi/antologi/afhandling/rapportRapport

26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstrakt

We argue that NATO allies exhibiting more "Atlanticist" strategic cultures allocate a greater share of their defense resources to Alliance priorities than those exhibiting "Europeanist" strategic cultures. Our analysis builds on policy discussions regarding imbalances in burden-sharing in transatlantic security. Scholarship in the fields of international security and political economy offers plausible explanations for these imbalances, but does not address how allies allocate resources within defense budgets and does not statistically test effects of cultural variables on such decisions. Using evidence from 89 national security strategy documents of 24 NATO allies, we argue that the more states' strategic cultures tend toward Atlanticism, the more resources they allocated to military operations during a period in which such operations were the Alliance's top priority. During the height of NATO's "out of area" period from 2000 to 2012, there was a strong, positive correlation between, on the one hand, Atlanticist language in such documents and, on the other, allies' allocation of financial resources to military operations-as opposed to personnel, infrastructure, or equipment.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Udgivelses stedOslo
ForlagNorwegian Institute of International Affairs
Vol/bind16/2017
Antal sider4
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017
Udgivet eksterntJa

Fingeraftryk Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Burden-sharing in NATO: The Trump effect won’t last'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

  • Citationsformater