Black Boxes and Open Secrets: Trilogues as Politicized Diplomacy

Christilla Roederer-Rynning, Justin Greenwood

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

15 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

How can we explain the puzzling contrast between formal rules of open EU lawmaking and the practice of secluded trilogues? This question, arising against growing public controversy, points to a blind spot in the scholarly agenda on trilogues, which has overwhelmingly focused on their internal games. Drawing on the interpretivist tradition, we argue that rules are shaped by tradition and the dilemmas arising from conflicting beliefs and lived experiences. On this basis and drawing on extensive interview material, we argue that: 1) the vagaries of EU lawmaking can best be understood through the concept of ‘politicized diplomacy’; 2) a new tradition arose in support of seclusion, around the core belief of protecting the ‘space to think’; and 3) institutionalized contradictions, together with ideological tensions and ambiguous lessons from the lived experience of EU lawmakers have turned trilogues into a permeable institution, while prompting renewed public demands for transparency.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftWest European Politics
ISSN0140-2382
DOI
StatusAccepteret/In press - 2020

Fingeraftryk

diplomacy
EU
transparency
experience
interview

Citer dette

@article{a87fd1f1714e48f4872ff3410955f7f3,
title = "Black Boxes and Open Secrets: Trilogues as Politicized Diplomacy",
abstract = "How can we explain the puzzling contrast between formal rules of open EU lawmaking and the practice of secluded trilogues? This question, arising against growing public controversy, points to a blind spot in the scholarly agenda on trilogues, which has overwhelmingly focused on their internal games. Drawing on the interpretivist tradition, we argue that rules are shaped by tradition and the dilemmas arising from conflicting beliefs and lived experiences. On this basis and drawing on extensive interview material, we argue that: 1) the vagaries of EU lawmaking can best be understood through the concept of ‘politicized diplomacy’; 2) a new tradition arose in support of seclusion, around the core belief of protecting the ‘space to think’; and 3) institutionalized contradictions, together with ideological tensions and ambiguous lessons from the lived experience of EU lawmakers have turned trilogues into a permeable institution, while prompting renewed public demands for transparency.",
keywords = "ordinary legislative procedure, trilogues, seclusion, interpretive research, politiczed diplomacy",
author = "Christilla Roederer-Rynning and Justin Greenwood",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1080/01402382.2020.1716526",
language = "English",
journal = "West European Politics",
issn = "0140-2382",
publisher = "Heinemann",

}

Black Boxes and Open Secrets: Trilogues as Politicized Diplomacy. / Roederer-Rynning, Christilla; Greenwood, Justin.

I: West European Politics, 2020.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Black Boxes and Open Secrets: Trilogues as Politicized Diplomacy

AU - Roederer-Rynning, Christilla

AU - Greenwood, Justin

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - How can we explain the puzzling contrast between formal rules of open EU lawmaking and the practice of secluded trilogues? This question, arising against growing public controversy, points to a blind spot in the scholarly agenda on trilogues, which has overwhelmingly focused on their internal games. Drawing on the interpretivist tradition, we argue that rules are shaped by tradition and the dilemmas arising from conflicting beliefs and lived experiences. On this basis and drawing on extensive interview material, we argue that: 1) the vagaries of EU lawmaking can best be understood through the concept of ‘politicized diplomacy’; 2) a new tradition arose in support of seclusion, around the core belief of protecting the ‘space to think’; and 3) institutionalized contradictions, together with ideological tensions and ambiguous lessons from the lived experience of EU lawmakers have turned trilogues into a permeable institution, while prompting renewed public demands for transparency.

AB - How can we explain the puzzling contrast between formal rules of open EU lawmaking and the practice of secluded trilogues? This question, arising against growing public controversy, points to a blind spot in the scholarly agenda on trilogues, which has overwhelmingly focused on their internal games. Drawing on the interpretivist tradition, we argue that rules are shaped by tradition and the dilemmas arising from conflicting beliefs and lived experiences. On this basis and drawing on extensive interview material, we argue that: 1) the vagaries of EU lawmaking can best be understood through the concept of ‘politicized diplomacy’; 2) a new tradition arose in support of seclusion, around the core belief of protecting the ‘space to think’; and 3) institutionalized contradictions, together with ideological tensions and ambiguous lessons from the lived experience of EU lawmakers have turned trilogues into a permeable institution, while prompting renewed public demands for transparency.

KW - ordinary legislative procedure

KW - trilogues

KW - seclusion

KW - interpretive research

KW - politiczed diplomacy

U2 - 10.1080/01402382.2020.1716526

DO - 10.1080/01402382.2020.1716526

M3 - Journal article

JO - West European Politics

JF - West European Politics

SN - 0140-2382

ER -