Banking crisis management, recovery and resolution planning, and new governance theory: Approaching livingwills as a public-private collaborative form of regulation

Andrea Minto*

*Kontaktforfatter for dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

15 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

Over the last ten years the architecture of financial regulation and supervision in Europe has undergone sweeping changes. The demise of the previous "laissez faire era" unleashed an extraordinary torrent of EU institutional and regulatory reforms. Approaches, methodologies and tools by which financial institutions are regulated have drastically been revised to cope with the increasing complexity of modern financial intermediation. New forms of collaborative and polycentric governance in fact emerged as to better respond to sophisticated market failures, opening up to amplified participation and power-sharing between public and private actors. Crisis management and bank resolution represent an interesting area where regulators reserved some room for a public-private collaborative form of regulation. While there is some extensive scholarship placing recovery and resolution planning at the intersection of ex ante and ex post regulatory strategies, little attention has been paid to the specific modes of interaction between regulators and regulated entities. This study aims to advance knowledge by assessing the main features of living wills regulation in the light of the new governance theory. In so doing, it emphasizes the advantages of a dynamic cooperation between public (governments, regulators) and private (regulated) parties in overcoming looming market failures such as informational asymmetries and moral hazard.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEuropean Company and Financial Law Review
Vol/bind15
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)772-803
ISSN1613-2548
DOI
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2018

Fingeraftryk

banking
market failure
governance
regulation
planning
management
asymmetry
supervision
bank
EU
reform
participation
methodology
interaction
Public-private
Banking crisis
Governance theory
Crisis management
Planning
Market failure

Citer dette

@article{b459a99a8e5c4719a47ec5ce3fef8236,
title = "Banking crisis management, recovery and resolution planning, and new governance theory: Approaching livingwills as a public-private collaborative form of regulation",
abstract = "Over the last ten years the architecture of financial regulation and supervision in Europe has undergone sweeping changes. The demise of the previous {"}laissez faire era{"} unleashed an extraordinary torrent of EU institutional and regulatory reforms. Approaches, methodologies and tools by which financial institutions are regulated have drastically been revised to cope with the increasing complexity of modern financial intermediation. New forms of collaborative and polycentric governance in fact emerged as to better respond to sophisticated market failures, opening up to amplified participation and power-sharing between public and private actors. Crisis management and bank resolution represent an interesting area where regulators reserved some room for a public-private collaborative form of regulation. While there is some extensive scholarship placing recovery and resolution planning at the intersection of ex ante and ex post regulatory strategies, little attention has been paid to the specific modes of interaction between regulators and regulated entities. This study aims to advance knowledge by assessing the main features of living wills regulation in the light of the new governance theory. In so doing, it emphasizes the advantages of a dynamic cooperation between public (governments, regulators) and private (regulated) parties in overcoming looming market failures such as informational asymmetries and moral hazard.",
author = "Andrea Minto",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1515/ecfr-2018-0024",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "772--803",
journal = "European Company and Financial Law Review",
issn = "1613-2548",
publisher = "Walterde Gruyter GmbH",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Banking crisis management, recovery and resolution planning, and new governance theory

T2 - Approaching livingwills as a public-private collaborative form of regulation

AU - Minto, Andrea

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - Over the last ten years the architecture of financial regulation and supervision in Europe has undergone sweeping changes. The demise of the previous "laissez faire era" unleashed an extraordinary torrent of EU institutional and regulatory reforms. Approaches, methodologies and tools by which financial institutions are regulated have drastically been revised to cope with the increasing complexity of modern financial intermediation. New forms of collaborative and polycentric governance in fact emerged as to better respond to sophisticated market failures, opening up to amplified participation and power-sharing between public and private actors. Crisis management and bank resolution represent an interesting area where regulators reserved some room for a public-private collaborative form of regulation. While there is some extensive scholarship placing recovery and resolution planning at the intersection of ex ante and ex post regulatory strategies, little attention has been paid to the specific modes of interaction between regulators and regulated entities. This study aims to advance knowledge by assessing the main features of living wills regulation in the light of the new governance theory. In so doing, it emphasizes the advantages of a dynamic cooperation between public (governments, regulators) and private (regulated) parties in overcoming looming market failures such as informational asymmetries and moral hazard.

AB - Over the last ten years the architecture of financial regulation and supervision in Europe has undergone sweeping changes. The demise of the previous "laissez faire era" unleashed an extraordinary torrent of EU institutional and regulatory reforms. Approaches, methodologies and tools by which financial institutions are regulated have drastically been revised to cope with the increasing complexity of modern financial intermediation. New forms of collaborative and polycentric governance in fact emerged as to better respond to sophisticated market failures, opening up to amplified participation and power-sharing between public and private actors. Crisis management and bank resolution represent an interesting area where regulators reserved some room for a public-private collaborative form of regulation. While there is some extensive scholarship placing recovery and resolution planning at the intersection of ex ante and ex post regulatory strategies, little attention has been paid to the specific modes of interaction between regulators and regulated entities. This study aims to advance knowledge by assessing the main features of living wills regulation in the light of the new governance theory. In so doing, it emphasizes the advantages of a dynamic cooperation between public (governments, regulators) and private (regulated) parties in overcoming looming market failures such as informational asymmetries and moral hazard.

U2 - 10.1515/ecfr-2018-0024

DO - 10.1515/ecfr-2018-0024

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85058556349

VL - 15

SP - 772

EP - 803

JO - European Company and Financial Law Review

JF - European Company and Financial Law Review

SN - 1613-2548

IS - 4

ER -