Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for the degenerative meniscus tear: a comparison of patients included in RCTs and prospective cohort studies

  • Stan R. W. Wijn
  • , Gerjon Hannink*
  • , Jonas B. Thorlund
  • , Raine Sihvonen
  • , Martin Englund
  • , Maroeska M. Rovers
  • , Meniscus IPDMA collaboration group
  • *Kontaktforfatter

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

44 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background and purpose — Concerns exist regarding the generalizability of results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) to treat degenerative meniscus tears. It has been suggested that study populations are not representative of subjects selected for surgery in daily clinical practice. There-fore, we aimed to compare patients included in trials and prospective cohort studies that received APM for a degenerative meniscus tear. Patients and methods — Individual participant data from 4 RCTs and 2 cohort studies undergoing APM were collected. 1,970 patients were analyzed: 605 patients included in RCTs and 1,365 included in the cohorts. We compared patient and disease characteristics, knee pain, overall knee function, and health-related quality of life at baseline between the RCT and cohort groups using standardized differences, ratios comparing the variance of continuous covariates, and graphical methods such as quantile–quantile plots, side-by-side boxplots, and non-parametric density plots. Results — Differences between RCT and the cohort were observed primarily in age (younger patients in the cohort; standardized difference: 0.32) and disease severity, with the RCT group having more severe symptoms (standardized difference: 0.38). While knee pain, overall knee function, and quality of life generally showed minimal differences between the 2 groups, it is noteworthy that the largest observed difference was in knee pain, where the cohort group scored 7 points worse (95% confidence interval 5–9, standardized difference: 0.29). Conclusion — Patients in RCTs were largely representative of those in cohort studies regarding baseline scores, though variations in age and disease severity were observed. Younger patients with less severe osteoarthritis were more common in the cohort; however, trial participants still appear to be broadly representative of the target population.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Orthopaedica
Vol/bind94
Sider (fra-til)570-576
ISSN1745-3674
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 30. nov. 2023

Finansiering

Supported by the Junior Research project (2018) grant provided by the Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands and by a TOP grant by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW) Number: 91215058. Study data can be requested from the original principal investigators. JBT reports a research grant from Pfizer outside the submitted work (completed in 2022). All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Completed disclosure forms for this article following the ICMJE template are available on the article page, doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.24576

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for the degenerative meniscus tear: a comparison of patients included in RCTs and prospective cohort studies'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater