Actions for relationship value

a mission impossible?

Kristin B. Munksgaard*, Kirsten Frandsen

*Kontaktforfatter for dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Purpose: The form and content of relationship value dominates the literature. This paper contributes by studying companies’ actions based on their value perceptions, a field which has attracted less attention. Scholars advocate more studies on how companies’ value perceptions shape actions in relationships and how this leads to outcomes. Design/methodology/approach: A longitudinal critical case study of a customer/supplier relationship constitutes the empirical basis of the paper. Interviews and observation studies were conducted over a period of three years, giving access to special insight into the actors’ value perceptions and related actions. Findings: Value perceptions shape actions performed individually, jointly or in the wider network. Moreover, misperceptions of the counterparty’s value perceptions may result in a maelstrom of interactions with no specific value outcome. Acting based on value perceptions is a complex matter due to its evolving nature, which leads to development becoming a value driver. Research limitations/implications: The interdependencies between different value perceptions and their relational value drivers have special effects on actions and outcomes, also, value in actions needs to be studied. Practical implications: Management needs to explore value from different perspectives to understand the counterparty’s value perceptions and communicate own perceptions. It is not sufficient to create value based on one value driver. Instead, it is vital to be able to connect value drivers to balance and prioritise relevant actions. Originality/value: This paper stands out as one of the first contributions to relationship value literature that addresses and analyses value from both a customer perspective and a supplier perspective in a dyadic business relationship.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEuropean Journal of Marketing
Vol/bind53
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)892-915
ISSN0309-0566
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 13. maj 2019

Fingeraftryk

Relationship value
Value drivers
Suppliers
Business relationships
Interdependencies
Design methodology
Interaction
Misperception
Customer-supplier relationships

Citer dette

@article{a6219f45a28f48799ddd57d02e8359cd,
title = "Actions for relationship value: a mission impossible?",
abstract = "Purpose: The form and content of relationship value dominates the literature. This paper contributes by studying companies’ actions based on their value perceptions, a field which has attracted less attention. Scholars advocate more studies on how companies’ value perceptions shape actions in relationships and how this leads to outcomes. Design/methodology/approach: A longitudinal critical case study of a customer/supplier relationship constitutes the empirical basis of the paper. Interviews and observation studies were conducted over a period of three years, giving access to special insight into the actors’ value perceptions and related actions. Findings: Value perceptions shape actions performed individually, jointly or in the wider network. Moreover, misperceptions of the counterparty’s value perceptions may result in a maelstrom of interactions with no specific value outcome. Acting based on value perceptions is a complex matter due to its evolving nature, which leads to development becoming a value driver. Research limitations/implications: The interdependencies between different value perceptions and their relational value drivers have special effects on actions and outcomes, also, value in actions needs to be studied. Practical implications: Management needs to explore value from different perspectives to understand the counterparty’s value perceptions and communicate own perceptions. It is not sufficient to create value based on one value driver. Instead, it is vital to be able to connect value drivers to balance and prioritise relevant actions. Originality/value: This paper stands out as one of the first contributions to relationship value literature that addresses and analyses value from both a customer perspective and a supplier perspective in a dyadic business relationship.",
keywords = "Business relationships, Networks, Relationship value",
author = "Munksgaard, {Kristin B.} and Kirsten Frandsen",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1108/EJM-11-2017-0857",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "892--915",
journal = "European Journal of Marketing",
issn = "0309-0566",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "5",

}

Actions for relationship value : a mission impossible? / Munksgaard, Kristin B.; Frandsen, Kirsten.

I: European Journal of Marketing, Bind 53, Nr. 5, 13.05.2019, s. 892-915.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Actions for relationship value

T2 - a mission impossible?

AU - Munksgaard, Kristin B.

AU - Frandsen, Kirsten

PY - 2019/5/13

Y1 - 2019/5/13

N2 - Purpose: The form and content of relationship value dominates the literature. This paper contributes by studying companies’ actions based on their value perceptions, a field which has attracted less attention. Scholars advocate more studies on how companies’ value perceptions shape actions in relationships and how this leads to outcomes. Design/methodology/approach: A longitudinal critical case study of a customer/supplier relationship constitutes the empirical basis of the paper. Interviews and observation studies were conducted over a period of three years, giving access to special insight into the actors’ value perceptions and related actions. Findings: Value perceptions shape actions performed individually, jointly or in the wider network. Moreover, misperceptions of the counterparty’s value perceptions may result in a maelstrom of interactions with no specific value outcome. Acting based on value perceptions is a complex matter due to its evolving nature, which leads to development becoming a value driver. Research limitations/implications: The interdependencies between different value perceptions and their relational value drivers have special effects on actions and outcomes, also, value in actions needs to be studied. Practical implications: Management needs to explore value from different perspectives to understand the counterparty’s value perceptions and communicate own perceptions. It is not sufficient to create value based on one value driver. Instead, it is vital to be able to connect value drivers to balance and prioritise relevant actions. Originality/value: This paper stands out as one of the first contributions to relationship value literature that addresses and analyses value from both a customer perspective and a supplier perspective in a dyadic business relationship.

AB - Purpose: The form and content of relationship value dominates the literature. This paper contributes by studying companies’ actions based on their value perceptions, a field which has attracted less attention. Scholars advocate more studies on how companies’ value perceptions shape actions in relationships and how this leads to outcomes. Design/methodology/approach: A longitudinal critical case study of a customer/supplier relationship constitutes the empirical basis of the paper. Interviews and observation studies were conducted over a period of three years, giving access to special insight into the actors’ value perceptions and related actions. Findings: Value perceptions shape actions performed individually, jointly or in the wider network. Moreover, misperceptions of the counterparty’s value perceptions may result in a maelstrom of interactions with no specific value outcome. Acting based on value perceptions is a complex matter due to its evolving nature, which leads to development becoming a value driver. Research limitations/implications: The interdependencies between different value perceptions and their relational value drivers have special effects on actions and outcomes, also, value in actions needs to be studied. Practical implications: Management needs to explore value from different perspectives to understand the counterparty’s value perceptions and communicate own perceptions. It is not sufficient to create value based on one value driver. Instead, it is vital to be able to connect value drivers to balance and prioritise relevant actions. Originality/value: This paper stands out as one of the first contributions to relationship value literature that addresses and analyses value from both a customer perspective and a supplier perspective in a dyadic business relationship.

KW - Business relationships

KW - Networks

KW - Relationship value

U2 - 10.1108/EJM-11-2017-0857

DO - 10.1108/EJM-11-2017-0857

M3 - Journal article

VL - 53

SP - 892

EP - 915

JO - European Journal of Marketing

JF - European Journal of Marketing

SN - 0309-0566

IS - 5

ER -