Absorptive capacity for need knowledge: antecedents and effects for employee innovativeness

Tim Schweisfurth, Christina Raasch

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

148 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

Innovation occurs when knowledge about unmet customer needs intersects with knowledge about technological solutions. Both knowledge types are often located outside the firm and need to be absorbed in order for innovation to occur. While there has been extensive research into absorptive capacity for solution knowledge, a necessary complement − absorptive capacity for new customer needs − has been neglected. In an individual-level study of 864 employees from a home appliance firm, we show that need absorptive capacity is theoretically and empirically distinct from solution absorptive capacity, and that both are positively associated with employee innovativeness. Interestingly, we find asymmetric extra-domain effects: prior solution knowledge is positively related to need absorptive capacity (cross-pollination effect), while prior need knowledge is negatively related to solution absorptive capacity (attenuation effect). We contrast the cognitive underpinnings of the two absorptive capacity types, contributing to emerging scholarly thinking on the domain-specificity and micro foundations of absorptive capacity.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftResearch Policy
Vol/bind47
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)687-699
ISSN0048-7333
DOI
StatusUdgivet - maj 2018

Fingeraftryk

Personnel
Innovation
Domestic appliances
Innovativeness
Employees
Absorptive capacity
Customer needs

Citer dette

@article{a00154ebf6a84666a4d6564320ad9a96,
title = "Absorptive capacity for need knowledge: antecedents and effects for employee innovativeness",
abstract = "Innovation occurs when knowledge about unmet customer needs intersects with knowledge about technological solutions. Both knowledge types are often located outside the firm and need to be absorbed in order for innovation to occur. While there has been extensive research into absorptive capacity for solution knowledge, a necessary complement − absorptive capacity for new customer needs − has been neglected. In an individual-level study of 864 employees from a home appliance firm, we show that need absorptive capacity is theoretically and empirically distinct from solution absorptive capacity, and that both are positively associated with employee innovativeness. Interestingly, we find asymmetric extra-domain effects: prior solution knowledge is positively related to need absorptive capacity (cross-pollination effect), while prior need knowledge is negatively related to solution absorptive capacity (attenuation effect). We contrast the cognitive underpinnings of the two absorptive capacity types, contributing to emerging scholarly thinking on the domain-specificity and micro foundations of absorptive capacity.",
keywords = "Absorptive capacity, Individual level, Innovativeness, Need knowledge, Quantitative, Solution knowledge",
author = "Tim Schweisfurth and Christina Raasch",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.017",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "687--699",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

Absorptive capacity for need knowledge : antecedents and effects for employee innovativeness. / Schweisfurth, Tim ; Raasch, Christina.

I: Research Policy, Bind 47, Nr. 4, 05.2018, s. 687-699.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Absorptive capacity for need knowledge

T2 - antecedents and effects for employee innovativeness

AU - Schweisfurth, Tim

AU - Raasch, Christina

PY - 2018/5

Y1 - 2018/5

N2 - Innovation occurs when knowledge about unmet customer needs intersects with knowledge about technological solutions. Both knowledge types are often located outside the firm and need to be absorbed in order for innovation to occur. While there has been extensive research into absorptive capacity for solution knowledge, a necessary complement − absorptive capacity for new customer needs − has been neglected. In an individual-level study of 864 employees from a home appliance firm, we show that need absorptive capacity is theoretically and empirically distinct from solution absorptive capacity, and that both are positively associated with employee innovativeness. Interestingly, we find asymmetric extra-domain effects: prior solution knowledge is positively related to need absorptive capacity (cross-pollination effect), while prior need knowledge is negatively related to solution absorptive capacity (attenuation effect). We contrast the cognitive underpinnings of the two absorptive capacity types, contributing to emerging scholarly thinking on the domain-specificity and micro foundations of absorptive capacity.

AB - Innovation occurs when knowledge about unmet customer needs intersects with knowledge about technological solutions. Both knowledge types are often located outside the firm and need to be absorbed in order for innovation to occur. While there has been extensive research into absorptive capacity for solution knowledge, a necessary complement − absorptive capacity for new customer needs − has been neglected. In an individual-level study of 864 employees from a home appliance firm, we show that need absorptive capacity is theoretically and empirically distinct from solution absorptive capacity, and that both are positively associated with employee innovativeness. Interestingly, we find asymmetric extra-domain effects: prior solution knowledge is positively related to need absorptive capacity (cross-pollination effect), while prior need knowledge is negatively related to solution absorptive capacity (attenuation effect). We contrast the cognitive underpinnings of the two absorptive capacity types, contributing to emerging scholarly thinking on the domain-specificity and micro foundations of absorptive capacity.

KW - Absorptive capacity

KW - Individual level

KW - Innovativeness

KW - Need knowledge

KW - Quantitative

KW - Solution knowledge

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.017

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.017

M3 - Journal article

VL - 47

SP - 687

EP - 699

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 4

ER -