A comparison of high versus low dose of exercise training in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial with 12-months follow-up

Annemette Krintel Petersen*, Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard, Maurits van Tulder, Sussie Laustsen

*Kontaktforfatter for dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Objective: To assess if a higher dose of exercise training in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation could affect improvements in aerobic capacity and muscle strength. Design: Assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial with 12-months follow-up. Setting: Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. Subjects: A total of 164 cardiac patients referred to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation were recruited. Interventions: Patients were randomized to 1-hour exercise sessions either three times weekly for 12 weeks (36 sessions, high-dose group) or twice weekly for 8 weeks (16 sessions, low-dose group). The same standardized exercise and intensity protocol including aerobic and muscle strength training was used in all participants. Main measures: Primary outcome was changes in VO2peak. Secondary outcomes were changes in maximal workload, muscle strength and power. Measures were obtained at baseline, after termination of the rehabilitation programme and at follow-up after 6 and 12 months. Results: After the end of intervention, statistically significant between-group differences were seen in favour of the high-dose group in all outcomes: VO2peak 2.6 (mL kg−1 min−1) (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4–4.8), maximal workload 0.3 W kg−1 (95%CI: 0.02–0.5), isometric muscle strength 0.7 N m kg−1 (95%CI: 0.1–1.2) and muscle power 0.3 W kg−1 (95%CI: 0.04–0.6). After 12 months, a significant between-group difference only persisted in VO2peak and maximal workload. Conclusion: A higher dose of exercise training had a small effect on all outcomes at termination of intervention. A long-term effect persisted in VO2peak and maximal workload. Although the effect was small, it is an important finding because VO2peak is the most important predictor of all-cause mortality in cardiac patients.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftClinical Rehabilitation
Vol/bind34
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)69-81
ISSN0269-2155
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1. jan. 2020

Fingeraftryk

Randomized Controlled Trials
Exercise
Workload
Confidence Intervals
Resistance Training
Denmark
Cardiac Rehabilitation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Muscles

Citer dette

@article{c108f86524f546a0b5106487bbae8191,
title = "A comparison of high versus low dose of exercise training in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial with 12-months follow-up",
abstract = "Objective: To assess if a higher dose of exercise training in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation could affect improvements in aerobic capacity and muscle strength. Design: Assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial with 12-months follow-up. Setting: Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. Subjects: A total of 164 cardiac patients referred to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation were recruited. Interventions: Patients were randomized to 1-hour exercise sessions either three times weekly for 12 weeks (36 sessions, high-dose group) or twice weekly for 8 weeks (16 sessions, low-dose group). The same standardized exercise and intensity protocol including aerobic and muscle strength training was used in all participants. Main measures: Primary outcome was changes in VO2peak. Secondary outcomes were changes in maximal workload, muscle strength and power. Measures were obtained at baseline, after termination of the rehabilitation programme and at follow-up after 6 and 12 months. Results: After the end of intervention, statistically significant between-group differences were seen in favour of the high-dose group in all outcomes: VO2peak 2.6 (mL kg−1 min−1) (95{\%} confidence interval (CI): 0.4–4.8), maximal workload 0.3 W kg−1 (95{\%}CI: 0.02–0.5), isometric muscle strength 0.7 N m kg−1 (95{\%}CI: 0.1–1.2) and muscle power 0.3 W kg−1 (95{\%}CI: 0.04–0.6). After 12 months, a significant between-group difference only persisted in VO2peak and maximal workload. Conclusion: A higher dose of exercise training had a small effect on all outcomes at termination of intervention. A long-term effect persisted in VO2peak and maximal workload. Although the effect was small, it is an important finding because VO2peak is the most important predictor of all-cause mortality in cardiac patients.",
keywords = "Cardiac rehabilitation, dose response, exercise training, physical capacity, randomized controlled trial",
author = "Petersen, {Annemette Krintel} and Oestergaard, {Lisa Gregersen} and {van Tulder}, Maurits and Sussie Laustsen",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0269215519883411",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "69--81",
journal = "Clinical Rehabilitation",
issn = "0269-2155",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

A comparison of high versus low dose of exercise training in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation : a randomized controlled trial with 12-months follow-up. / Petersen, Annemette Krintel; Oestergaard, Lisa Gregersen; van Tulder, Maurits; Laustsen, Sussie.

I: Clinical Rehabilitation, Bind 34, Nr. 1, 01.01.2020, s. 69-81.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of high versus low dose of exercise training in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation

T2 - a randomized controlled trial with 12-months follow-up

AU - Petersen, Annemette Krintel

AU - Oestergaard, Lisa Gregersen

AU - van Tulder, Maurits

AU - Laustsen, Sussie

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - Objective: To assess if a higher dose of exercise training in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation could affect improvements in aerobic capacity and muscle strength. Design: Assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial with 12-months follow-up. Setting: Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. Subjects: A total of 164 cardiac patients referred to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation were recruited. Interventions: Patients were randomized to 1-hour exercise sessions either three times weekly for 12 weeks (36 sessions, high-dose group) or twice weekly for 8 weeks (16 sessions, low-dose group). The same standardized exercise and intensity protocol including aerobic and muscle strength training was used in all participants. Main measures: Primary outcome was changes in VO2peak. Secondary outcomes were changes in maximal workload, muscle strength and power. Measures were obtained at baseline, after termination of the rehabilitation programme and at follow-up after 6 and 12 months. Results: After the end of intervention, statistically significant between-group differences were seen in favour of the high-dose group in all outcomes: VO2peak 2.6 (mL kg−1 min−1) (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4–4.8), maximal workload 0.3 W kg−1 (95%CI: 0.02–0.5), isometric muscle strength 0.7 N m kg−1 (95%CI: 0.1–1.2) and muscle power 0.3 W kg−1 (95%CI: 0.04–0.6). After 12 months, a significant between-group difference only persisted in VO2peak and maximal workload. Conclusion: A higher dose of exercise training had a small effect on all outcomes at termination of intervention. A long-term effect persisted in VO2peak and maximal workload. Although the effect was small, it is an important finding because VO2peak is the most important predictor of all-cause mortality in cardiac patients.

AB - Objective: To assess if a higher dose of exercise training in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation could affect improvements in aerobic capacity and muscle strength. Design: Assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial with 12-months follow-up. Setting: Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. Subjects: A total of 164 cardiac patients referred to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation were recruited. Interventions: Patients were randomized to 1-hour exercise sessions either three times weekly for 12 weeks (36 sessions, high-dose group) or twice weekly for 8 weeks (16 sessions, low-dose group). The same standardized exercise and intensity protocol including aerobic and muscle strength training was used in all participants. Main measures: Primary outcome was changes in VO2peak. Secondary outcomes were changes in maximal workload, muscle strength and power. Measures were obtained at baseline, after termination of the rehabilitation programme and at follow-up after 6 and 12 months. Results: After the end of intervention, statistically significant between-group differences were seen in favour of the high-dose group in all outcomes: VO2peak 2.6 (mL kg−1 min−1) (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4–4.8), maximal workload 0.3 W kg−1 (95%CI: 0.02–0.5), isometric muscle strength 0.7 N m kg−1 (95%CI: 0.1–1.2) and muscle power 0.3 W kg−1 (95%CI: 0.04–0.6). After 12 months, a significant between-group difference only persisted in VO2peak and maximal workload. Conclusion: A higher dose of exercise training had a small effect on all outcomes at termination of intervention. A long-term effect persisted in VO2peak and maximal workload. Although the effect was small, it is an important finding because VO2peak is the most important predictor of all-cause mortality in cardiac patients.

KW - Cardiac rehabilitation

KW - dose response

KW - exercise training

KW - physical capacity

KW - randomized controlled trial

U2 - 10.1177/0269215519883411

DO - 10.1177/0269215519883411

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31642352

AN - SCOPUS:85074418711

VL - 34

SP - 69

EP - 81

JO - Clinical Rehabilitation

JF - Clinical Rehabilitation

SN - 0269-2155

IS - 1

ER -