Oke Gerke

Søgeresultater

• 2021

  Sources of error with cardiovascular PET/CT and PET/MRI and questions to be answered to achieve clinical usefulness

  Høilund-Carlsen, P. F. & Gerke, O., okt. 2021, I: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. 28, 5, 2421.

  Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Kommentar/debat › Forskning › peer review
• 2017

  Response to “Comment on State-of-the-Art Imaging in Pulmonary Embolism: Ventilation/Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography versus Computed Tomography Angiography—Controversies, Results, and Recommendations from a Systematic Review”

  Hess, S., Frary, E. C., Gerke, O. & Madsen, P. H., nov. 2017, I: Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis. 43, 8, s. 904-906

  Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Kommentar/debat › Forskning › peer review
• 2014

  Response to: Letter to the editor on: Optimisation of post-mortem cardiac computed tomography compared to optical coherence tomography and histopathology - Technical note

  Precht, H., Leth, P. M., Thygesen, J., Hardt-Madsen, M., Nielsen, B., Falk, E., Egstrup, K., Gerke, O., Broersen, A., Kitslaar, P. H., Dijkstra, J. & Lambrechtsen, J., 2014, I: Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging. 2, 3, s. 159

  Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Kommentar/debat › Forskning › peer review
• 2011

  Reply: Author reply to [18F]-fluorocholine positron-emission/computed tomography for lymph node staging of patients with prostate cancer: preliminary results of a prospective study

  Poulsen, M. H., Høilund-Carlsen, P. F., Gerke, O. & Walter, S., jan. 2011, I: British Journal of Urology. 107, 1, s. 159 1 s.

  Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Kommentar/debat › Forskning › peer review